|
|
Post by Batman 21 on Jan 28, 2008 15:55:45 GMT -5
Just know this....those USFA divisions you see as 08 alignments isn't worth the paper it's printed on.
The best I can say is, we've had contact with the Force and they have not OFFICIALLY RESIGNED as a member of the MCFL. Until an official spokesman from the Force notifies the MCFL brass....the Force are still and ACTIVE and CURRENT member of the MCFL.
Nuff Said!!!!
|
|
|
|
Post by doesnt matter on Jan 28, 2008 16:08:41 GMT -5
doesnt matter they wont be the same team anyway thanks to the seminoles taking their best players and other teams in that area. i hope they do stay in the mcfl because the mcfl needs them more than the usfa, this goes to show you just how desperate that the mcfl is. it was a time when the mcfl would have come out and said you have been talking to another league about joining, we dont want you anymore. boy how times have changed in the mcfl, they are desperate to keep it goin even settling for things of this nature. force please stay in the mcfl it is sad to see them like this.
|
|
|
|
Post by Devon A. Jones-Warriors HOF on Jan 28, 2008 16:28:28 GMT -5
Thanks for the kind words Bat.
As far as the USFA for 08. The teams that we have placed in a divisional alignment had expressed interest in the league, and had "verbally" committed as members. Of course past experience has shown that until the money for league fees are in hand, then that is all you have is someones word. If the Force decides they want to stay in the MCFL that is fine, but we would like to have them in the USFA. Randy and Danial have more insight into what our member (and proposed) member teams are doing. All I can comment on is the teams I know petitioned, and were accepted to our league.
|
|
|
|
Post by What on Jan 28, 2008 18:18:23 GMT -5
Bats you are pretty much saying that the Ravens and Seminoles are the league and no new team will have to play them right. Wasn't there four teams with 1 loss last year? Wouldn't that mean that all three returning teams should be mentioned at the top instead of just two detroit teams. If that is not the case then the Ravens should be the only team mentioned because they beat both of you. Go Fire!!!!!
|
|
|
|
Post by Batman 21 on Jan 28, 2008 22:58:37 GMT -5
Bats you are pretty much saying that the Ravens and Seminoles are the league and no new team will have to play them right. Wasn't there four teams with 1 loss last year? Wouldn't that mean that all three returning teams should be mentioned at the top instead of just two detroit teams. If that is not the case then the Ravens should be the only team mentioned because they beat both of you. Go Fire!!!!! No, Im not saying that.....YOU are. This is a case of you being maybe a bit sensitive and tryng to crusade a pointless argument. The TWO top teams in he MCFL - by percentage points and also through ON FIELD play were the Detroit Ravens and Detroit Seminoles. This point was validated even more, with both teams playing in the championship game. If you recall the final standings were reflective of the final seeding. 1) Detroit Ravens 2) Detroit Seminoles 3) Hardin County Wolverines 4) Cleveland Lions |
|
